Гарри Поттер против Сумерек Club
Присоединиться
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
1.Ginny is a perfect character (“Mary Sue”), which Rowling hides by calling her temperamental.
2. Being temperamental is not a flaw if everyone thinks it’s cute and adorable and it gets Ты a boyfriend.
3. NOBODY can do anything productive without magic.
4. Ginny runs after a train like an idiot even though this isn’t her first time watching the train leave with her brothers. Obviously she’s watch the train leave EVERY SINGLE год OF HER LIFE.
5. Rowling is living out her own fantasies through Hermione, who is clearly herself.
6. The Книги aren’t well written, just because Ты make up...
continue reading...
added by youknowit101
Source: drappleluv.tumblr
added by youknowit101
Source: drappleluv.tumblr
added by youknowit101
Source: iiloverrrkristenstew@tumblr
added by youknowit101
Source: pubsub
added by narniafreak12
Source: failbook
added by BellaLovett
added by Gred_and_Forge
Source: Tumblr
added by Gred_and_Forge
Source: Tumblr
added by KateKicksAss
added by Gred_and_Forge
Source: Tumblr
added by harrypotterbest
(i have edited this Статья so there r no spelling mistakes :) )

Hello everyone, today I'm going to tell Ты why Twilight is a BILLION times better than the Harry Potter. Here are some reasons.

1. First, they are no swear words!! I mean I heard in Hp they is swearing, like "h*ll" and "b*tch" I mean little kids are Чтение that!! Like 7 and 8 years olds!! It's crazy!!!111 In Twilight, there is no swearing beacuse it is a child безопасно, сейф book :)

2. HP is for kids only!! I mean Twilight is for all ages!!! I haven't read HP but I know only little kids read it!! Twilight is for everyone, my 10 год old...
continue reading...
Taking arms against Harry Potter, at this moment, is to emulate Hamlet taking arms against a sea of troubles. By opposing the sea, Ты won't end it. The Harry Potter epiphenomenon will go on, doubtless for some time, as J. R. R. Tolkien did, and then wane.

The official newspaper of our dominant counter-culture, The New York Times, has been startled by the Potter Книги into establishing a new policy for its not very literate book review. Rather than crowd out the Grishams, Clancys, Crichtons, Kings, and other vastly Популярное prose fictions on its fiction bestseller list, the Potter volumes will...
continue reading...
added by frankthe2nd
Source: tumblr