Ответить на этот вопрос

Гарри Поттер против Сумерек Вопрос

On all fiction saga fanbases, Lord of the Rings came first. It's successor is the Harry Potter series. Many claim Twilight is Harry Potter's. What do Ты think? Is Twilight the successor of Harry Potter?

For me, I do not think so, especially that Вампиры DO NOT sparkle :P
*
I'll add a subquestion: Why?
ryomaidol posted Больше года
*
well many people like Twihards and the MEDIA do deny that HP will be TW's predecessor.
ryomaidol posted Больше года
*
^ sorry I mean, [i] do emphasize that HP will be TW's predecessor. [/i]
ryomaidol posted Больше года
 ryomaidol posted Больше года
next question »

Гарри Поттер против Сумерек  Лучший ответ

ilovereading said:
The term Фэнтези means a genre of literature that origins from fairytales, legends and myths and for its setting, plot или theme uses Сверхъестественное elements like magic.
J. R. R. Tolkien is, with his The Lord of the Rings (and other Книги like Hobbit, Silmallirion...) know as the father of modern fantasy.

Now, Harry Potter series and Lord of the Rings have much in common. They are both epic или high Фэнтези in which main theme is conflict between good and evil, hero`s struggle for victory etc.
I would never dare to say that Harry Potter is better than Lord of the Rings, although I like it еще (simply because it is closer to my time and way of thinking).

Twilight and great works of epic Фэнтези have almost nothing in common, except maybe for large fanbase and a couple of mythical creatures.
Yes, Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings have Любовь to, but it`s not used as main plot issue. And no, chit chat between the Volturi and Cullens is not exactly good vs evil.

Twilight is not successor of Harry Potter because a romance "fantasy" story does not have what it takes to set foundations for Далее generation of (good) Фэнтези writers.
select as best answer
posted Больше года 
*
Best answer, dear friend.
Queenoftard posted Больше года
next question »

Ответы

ToyletGnome said:
I don't think Harry Potter is necessarily the successor of Lord of the Rings because that would imply that it has replaced it, which it hasn't. I think that, еще accurately, Harry Potter is the Далее Фэнтези series to Присоединиться the ranks of Lord of the Rings and the Chronicles of Narnia as a timeless Фэнтези classic which will be remembered for generations to come. Twilight will never be part of this group.

Twilight is not an epic fantasy, a timeless classic, well written, или anything еще than a fad. It's a cheesy romance novel, so for it to be "the Далее Harry Potter," literature must surely die first.
select as best answer
posted Больше года 
*
I was going to post an answer to this question, but you've сказал(-а) everything for me. *hugs*
ChocAttack266 posted Больше года
*
^ *double hugs with extra glompage*
ToyletGnome posted Больше года
*
*huggles back* Yupyupyup. :)
sleazy_weasley posted Больше года
Persephone713 said:
That was something the Press came up with to hype the series even more. LOTR, Harry Potter, and звезда Wars are in the Same league. But Twilight will never live on as long as those three fanbases. Twilight is a fad. That is why they are coming out so fast in theatres. For fear of lack of interest. But that really erked me when they сказал(-а) " Twilight is the Далее Harry Potter" или " Stephanie Meyer is the Далее Jo Rowling" Really? Give me break. или I'll have the Death Eaters Give Ты a visit. Everything the press is fabricated and untrue.
select as best answer
 That was something the Press came up with to hype the series even more. LOTR, Harry Potter, and звезда Wars are in the Same league. But Twilight will never live on as long as those three fanbases. Twilight is a fad. That is why they are coming out so fast in theatres. For fear of lack of interest. But that really erked me when they сказал(-а) " Twilight is the Далее Harry Potter" или " Stephanie Meyer is the Далее Jo Rowling" Really? Give me break. или I'll have the Death Eaters Give Ты a visit. Everything the press is fabricated and untrue.
posted Больше года 
*
Awesome.
kwlski4ever posted Больше года
*
Mmmm... Staaaaar Waaaaars. Yum.
ToyletGnome posted Больше года
kwlski4ever said:
No way.
select as best answer
posted Больше года 
HaleyDewit said:
Are Ты kidding me?Totally not!Not even close!
select as best answer
posted Больше года 
abitofaLunaTic said:
No, I don't think so
select as best answer
posted Больше года 
electricelle said:
twilight is like one звезда (albeit an overly glittery, sparkles covered one) in a galaxy compared to lord of the rings или harry potter :D.
It only scratches at the surface in comparison to their originality creativity and depth :P
select as best answer
posted Больше года 
Aquamarina said:
No, I don´t think Harry Potter is the successor of Lord of the Rings and I don´t think Twilight is the successor of Harry Potter either.
They do not base on each other, but on some elements out of old legends (like dragons, wizards, vampires,...) and on the creativity of their author.
In my opinion, it just happened by accident that LotR was the first great Фэнтези saga.
If Twilight или HP were the first ones, we would say that the others base on them.
But the only thing these three series have in common is the existing of magic/magical elements. Apart from that, they are completely different.
select as best answer
posted Больше года 
MadamOcta13 said:
No, because in 200 hundred years, people will still be Чтение HP. People will also be saying "Stephenie who?"
select as best answer
posted Больше года 
*
How do Ты want to know that?
Aquamarina posted Больше года
*
You're kidding right?
MadamOcta13 posted Больше года
*
future*
venvargie posted Больше года
sleazy_weasley said:
No, because Harry Potter is actually GOOD, as opposed to Twilight. -_-

Too tired to give real reasons, sorry. I might come back later and Редактировать my answer. :)
select as best answer
posted Больше года 
apukarajagi said:
LOTR and harry potter are just great Книги that took the authors soo much time to put together. if anything narnia should Присоединиться the leaque of harry and frodo.
twilight has no place on its shelf.
twilight can sit in the bin where it belongs
select as best answer
posted Больше года 
*
Ikr
sami99 posted Больше года
*
I think it's kind of funny how childrens' Книги are held as highly as LOTR, not that I'm a Фан of any of them.
cassie-1-2-3 posted Больше года
sami99 said:
If I had to ordered them it would go like this 1lord of the rings 2harry potter 3twilight
select as best answer
posted Больше года 
next question »