Do Ты think Breaking Dawn being in two parts is necessary?a

As I сказал(-а) on the other one (link), there is still a lot of necessary stuff -- too much to squeeze into a two час movie (There was the wedding and honey moon and Bella finding out she was pregnant (it is still a romance so they aren't going to cut those parts out/down), there's the thing with Jacobs wolf-pack, the explanation (however half-assed it was) about Nessie, Irina finding out about her and running to the Volturi, there's the whole explanation about the Immortal Children, Alice and Jasper running off, the gathering (and practicing) of the other clans, and the "showdown" at the end. It's too much stuff to put into one two-hour long movie.)

Also, just like with any ending, they have to заворачивать, обертывание up all lose ends. While Twilight, New Moon, and Eclipse did a great job of sticking to the books, they still had to chop bits out for the sake of time and money. Now that the movie's are coming to an end, they have to go back and fill in any and all holes that were made/left from the editing.

Think about it this way: Breaking Dawn is about 760 some-odd-pages long. Harry Potter and the Goblet of огонь is a little over 730 some-odd-pages long. That's a thirty some-odd-page difference. They squeezed GoF into a two час movie by taking out "unnecessary" parts and HP Фаны thought that was a bad idea because most of that "unneeded stuff" was actually needed (not only for the movie itself, but for the entire series). BD is the same way -- a lot of that "filler stuff" is actually necessary to the plot of BD and to the series as a whole.

No, because length does not equal content. and there are a lot of scenes and parts that is not relevant to the mainplot, that Ты can take them out and still have the story.
$$$$$$$ <---- i think is the main reason

Yes.
Use the Поиск bar and find one of the Назад Вопросы asking the same thing, and you'll see my explanation.

I'm mobile, making it impossible for me to copy and paste like I would have done.

If HP and the Order of the Phoenix - filled with еще subplots than the whole TS combined - can be edited into one movie, so can Breaking Dawn. But maybe, like HP OoP, it won't turn out to be too good. Cutting too many scenes would make it garbled, I guess.
But even then, I'm not sure it requires to be in two parts - many things that go on for pages in the book can be cut down to a few scenes in the movie.

well, it's long so yeah

Maybe. I dunno, I'd have to read it again.

Even though I already answered the HP one, I'll still answer this one. I don't mind.

While some parts seem to be filler (like Jacob looking around near the end of part two of BD for a girl to imprint, although someone might find some kind of significance in that. I don't, though.), there are still lots of important things going on in the book that need to be a part of the two movies, and it'd be hard to put in just a single movie. And what with the switching perspective's of Bella, Jacob, and then Bella again, it'd be confusing in just one movie.

^^i think your wrong personally, the movie needs details to go along with the mainplot или else itd be a crappy movie. theres alot of stuff going on in the 4th book to much to put into one movie,the scenes would be sorta of rushed an squished. The еще the merrier ! (:
ilovetwilight<3

Yes it does in order for the movie 2 be as good as the book.

They were just copying off of what Harry Potter was doing! Harry Potter nerds UNITE!!! So NO!

Hope Ты agree,-miss_weasley