I don't consider the Harry Potter Wiki as reliable. Because according to its canon policy: if Rowling hasn't specifically denied something about a film in the Книги или in other words, whatever the films say is to be first and foremost promoted in the Статьи as a canon fact instead of the books' facts.
In my logic it should be the other way around. That the books' canon should be promoted first and foremost - exactly becasuse the Книги are the tier 1 canon and the Фильмы only the tier 2 или 3 even - and because we can not be sure what about the films are from Rowling's hints and what are just the film makers' interpretations. By all chances it may be promoting as canon something that is totally fanon.
Apparently the Wiki's policy is that silence is a sign of agreement. I would rather trust words, because silence can have so many other reasons too. And how likely is it that Rowling would bother to point out everything that the film makers made different than her intent is? Not likely, because during the productions she already gave them everything she felt necessary and whatever they made with it, they had the right to with the creative lisence. It seems to me Rowling has publicly прокомментировал(-а) only on mistakes that hold some special amusement или other feeling to her personally: such as the movie Dumbledore talking about a girl though in her intent Dumbledore was gay.
The Harry Potter Wiki says that Barty Crouch Jr. took part in the torture of the Longbottoms even though according to the book, he may have not and Rowling even put weight on it and never confirmed the truth. Did Rowling tell the film makers her intent and did they use it? We don't know, yet that Wiki chooses to promote the movie's decision as canon. Even though the film makers evidently turned Junior's character and the entire trial scene upside down anyway. What in the world makes them believe that it cared about the canon Junior in anything else either?
The way the Harry Potter Wiki is now, it makes the Фильмы the main event and the tier 1 canon, even though that naturally should be the books.
Rowling and her intent is the true canon and thus the Книги she wrote and whatever she does say publicly should be the main Источник of canon facts, and not some Болталка films we don't even know how much she was involved with.
A Wiki which policy trustes and first and foremost promotes a horribly unreliable, barely semi-official information instead of the tier 1 canon, is not something I would trust for canon matters.
In my logic it should be the other way around. That the books' canon should be promoted first and foremost - exactly becasuse the Книги are the tier 1 canon and the Фильмы only the tier 2 или 3 even - and because we can not be sure what about the films are from Rowling's hints and what are just the film makers' interpretations. By all chances it may be promoting as canon something that is totally fanon.
Apparently the Wiki's policy is that silence is a sign of agreement. I would rather trust words, because silence can have so many other reasons too. And how likely is it that Rowling would bother to point out everything that the film makers made different than her intent is? Not likely, because during the productions she already gave them everything she felt necessary and whatever they made with it, they had the right to with the creative lisence. It seems to me Rowling has publicly прокомментировал(-а) only on mistakes that hold some special amusement или other feeling to her personally: such as the movie Dumbledore talking about a girl though in her intent Dumbledore was gay.
The Harry Potter Wiki says that Barty Crouch Jr. took part in the torture of the Longbottoms even though according to the book, he may have not and Rowling even put weight on it and never confirmed the truth. Did Rowling tell the film makers her intent and did they use it? We don't know, yet that Wiki chooses to promote the movie's decision as canon. Even though the film makers evidently turned Junior's character and the entire trial scene upside down anyway. What in the world makes them believe that it cared about the canon Junior in anything else either?
The way the Harry Potter Wiki is now, it makes the Фильмы the main event and the tier 1 canon, even though that naturally should be the books.
Rowling and her intent is the true canon and thus the Книги she wrote and whatever she does say publicly should be the main Источник of canon facts, and not some Болталка films we don't even know how much she was involved with.
A Wiki which policy trustes and first and foremost promotes a horribly unreliable, barely semi-official information instead of the tier 1 canon, is not something I would trust for canon matters.
Rupert Grint is now naked on cherrybomb. The film is about three teenagers who embark on a debauched weekend of drink, drugs, shoplifting and stealing cars. and also grab girl by dirty thing. According to the Sun, Grint no longer sports the floppy hair, and he showed a lot of confidence doing the naked scene with his co-star Kimberley Nixon
Emma also ready for Naked for one producer that i forgot the name. unhappy those producer not offering film to emma yet. she also want to change her image to nude
Enjoy! Some character's actors!
lol
This includes:
- Hermione Granger's actor Emma Watson
- Harry Potter's actor Daniel Radcliffe
- Ron Weasley's actor Rupert Grint
- Draco Malfoy's actor Tom Felton
- Ginny Weasley's actor Bonnie Wright
- Severus Snape's actor Alan Rickman
:)
XOXO
lol
This includes:
- Hermione Granger's actor Emma Watson
- Harry Potter's actor Daniel Radcliffe
- Ron Weasley's actor Rupert Grint
- Draco Malfoy's actor Tom Felton
- Ginny Weasley's actor Bonnie Wright
- Severus Snape's actor Alan Rickman
:)
XOXO
Emma Watson played Hermione Granger through the whole series. Here is a pic of Hermione in the sorcerer's stone. Emma Watson was 10 while playing Hermione.
After a few years, Emma Watson looked like this and she continued to play Hermione, as the character Hermione grew with her.
Although Harry Potter movies made her shine, she also acted in a lot of different movies too.
Emma Watson was born in 1990 and she is a British Actress and activist. She also played Belle in the beauty and the beast and participated in a lot more films.
Emma Charlotte Duerre Watson is now 32 years old :)
Daniel Radcliffe is an actor born in 1998, and he shined with the movies Harry Potter. He was 11 to play in the first Harry Potter movie.
Actor made millions of dollars in the movies and is 33 now. He has a relationship with an actress called Erin Darke.
Rupert Alexander Lloyd Grint was born in 24 August 1988. Known for playing Ron Weasley in the Harry Potter series and is English.
Actor now about to be 34 years old :)
Tom Felton was portrayed as Draco Malfoy in every HP movie. Tom was born in 1987 and has a very successful career like others!
Tom Felton is 37 years old now and is in a relationship with Jade Olivia Gordon.
Bonnie Wright played Ginny Weasley and earned fame from it. She is an actress born in 1991 London and is also a model. She was 9 while playing Ginny.
Bonnie Wright is now 31 years old and has Andrew Lococo as her husband.
Alan Rickman was an actor born in 21 February 1946 and died 14 January 2016. RIP :(
He played Severus Snape in Harry Potter movies. No one can make a better Snape than Alan Rickman. Don't even try.
Enough for today! Tysm for reading.
Hello Newt, we meet again.
The Cover of the Script Book.
