I don't think Barack has had enough experience.

miiamya, I'm quoting will.i.am from the Black Eyed Peas here:

"Martin Luther King didn't have experience to lead...
Kennedy didn't have experience to lead...
Susan B. Anthony...
Nelson Mandela...
Rosa Parks...
Gandhi...
Anne Frank...
and everyone else who has had a hand in molding the freedoms we have and take for granted today...

no one truly has experience to deal with the world today...

they just need "desire, strength, courage ability, and passion" to change...
and to stand for something even when people say it's not possible..."

I believe Obama has that desire, strength, courage, ability and passion to lead.

well miiyami or watever he hell ur name is OBAMA f*******ing rock seen? he has more potential. hilary is just a stuck up fool

iLoVeObAmA: Let's keep things civil here. I am a happy Obamaniac, but if Hillary won the primaries, I would still vote for her over any of the Republican candidates.

i agree with you johnminh

well id vote for huckabee over hilary johnminh ANYDAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYY!

This question isn't asking who would be a better leader, it's asking who would bring about more change; and promising change does not automatically make a leader a good one.. No offense to iLoVeObAmA, but this is a moronic question. Change is a bilateral term- change does not necessarily mean some thing needed or beneficiary. Change is just a word- it can be good or bad- and it cannot be substituted for good or better. Besides, how many politicians promise 'change' and never follow through? The answer is countless. You cannot base your vote on reccuring vague promises of something that may not exist. I understand why you asked this type of question, but to begin with, you should have asked: 'Which one could be a better leader?'