when Ты go around Fanpop Ты will see there is an obvious era of Дисней everyone's in favor of: The 90's but they are only successful because most of the members are from that era, they grew up with them and there for they think they are the best, and although that's great that they think so, that is far from successful economically.
Believe it или not Золушка is еще successful than The Little Mermaid, and Lady and the Tramp is еще successful than Aladdin. not by much but still. this is exactly what I'm talking about. Many of the Дисней Фильмы of the late 30s- 60s are very well known but many people who didn't exist in that generation might say things like "its OK but its just old". when in fact many Фильмы are very similar to others, Bambi and the Lion King, Золушка and Aladdin, and every Дисней princess movie is very similar (they are all about a girl who wants something more). they just appeal to the audience of the generation more. with a few exceptions.
and one final note, remember what i сказал(-а) about monumentally successful, well here are some reviews of some very Популярное yet unsuccessful или less that monumental Дисней Фильмы (from Rottontomatoes.com)
The Hunchback of Notre Dame-
"Considering that Дисней couldn't help but trash Victor Hugo's novel in the process of reforming it for tender young sensibilities, this animated adaptation of his Notre Dame de Paris is pricklier and еще disturbing than we had any right to expect."
Mulan-
"Memo to the gang at Walt Дисней animation: Your formula is showing."
Hercules-
[An] insipid, lifeless, animated feature.
Tarzan- " Дисней Studios seems to Любовь the concept of feral children."
but сено, сена half of the Дисней Фильмы that are in the Дисней свод, хранилище got reviews like these and look where they are today.
but be warned when Ты have kids, don't be surprized if they say things like
"Beauty and the Beast is ok, but its just...... old, i don't get it, i like Tangled/ Frozen/ whatever much better."
