Bond_Of_Fury So, you say that Andrew Garfield plays a better Peter Parker because he looks better? Tsk. Andrew Garfield did a good job of playing the role (frankly, I was even surprised he played the role that good), but he was nowhere near as good as Tobey Maguire. At the first day of shooting the first Spider-Man movie, everyone thought of Tobey to be a total miscast, but he surprised everyone on the set. Honestly, there could have been no better at Peter Parker at the time than Tobey Maguire. Don't get me wrong, I liked Andrew Garfield as Tobey Maguire, but all he did was a decent job. Not quite as good as Tobey Maguire.

DR76 How can I put this? I don't agree with you. Both Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield gave excellent performances as Peter Parker aka Spider-Man. However, I'm a little more inclined toward Maguire because he portrayed the role a little more closer to the original comic book character, whereas Garfield has a tendency to inject a bit of young Marlon Brando . . . which is almost off putting. Almost. One more thing . . . ["Sorry Toby but you are just not the one the fans are looking."] Do you actually call yourself speaking on behalf of all Spidey fans?