Critical Analysis of Twilight Club
Присоединиться
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
This is under 'opinion' so please don't send any hate, it's just a though I had.

I have read various explainations both on this site and others about things antis point out as plot holes. (Ex: Renessme, Imprinting, Vampire Transformation, ect.) And I think that it's great that some people do think it through and don't just take it because it is what was written. What I don't understand is why Ты should have too.

In my mind, when an Автор creates a story with a new или different breed of creature they should explain it atleast to some degree.

I'm not saying she needs to explain every little thing, but could she explain it as simply as she could if she didn't want to bore people with details?Now, maybe she did and I just don't remeber, it has been a long time since I read them. But from what I remember in Breaking Dawn she refrences an incubus, creating the oxymoron virgin incubus.

Here is the dictionary definition of incubus:

an imaginary demon или evil spirit supposed to descend upon sleeping persons, especially one fabled to have sexual intercourse with women during their sleep.

Now, if I'm wrong please explain it in a comment, but I don't think that they were speaking a metaphor. Now if she was refrencing Edward by sayin gthis it makes no since. Вампиры and incubus are two diffrenet mythical creatures.

Another point I don't understand is how imprinting works. Is it based on attraction или genetics?

Because gentically speaking I don't think a shifter and a half-vampire would breed full shifters; and if they did and eventually their family line turned into shifters again wouldn't they feel the need to harm themselves because they could smell the vampire in them?

And if it's based on animalistic attraction why would a shifter feel anamalisticly drawn to a creature that's race disgust him in every way?

Again, I'm not trying to hate. I just don't understand this because it was never explained (or I don't remember).
added by Mallory23
Source: www.fanpop.com/spots/twilight-crepusculo
added by Jasper_LUVER
added by Kiky132
added by Cinders
Source: Randall Munroe (xkcd.com)
added by KateKicksAss
added by Bluelunacy7
added by nessienjake
added by HPgirlLerman
added by Plenilunio
Source: surgeondesang @ LJ
added by rachaelwsz
Source: Regency Enterprises
added by _KANdYLANd_
Source: g00GLE
added by McDreamyluva
added by housefrk
added by cassie-1-2-3
Source: twilightfacts.tumblr.com
added by snoznoodle
Source: Me
added by Synthwave
Analysis mixed with humor...and Ты get this video. Hope Ты enjoy watching!
video
twilight
funny
Эдвард Каллен
critical analysis
criticism
Белла Свон
Стефани Майер
Вампиры
added by tellymaster
Source: Google
I saw a review of the new Twilight movie, and in a generally negative review one thing сказал(-а) in defence of the movie was that Bella doesn't dress like a skank (paraphrased) and she just looks like a normal girl, which was called a good message as they felt it's healthier for girls to see Bella/Kristin Stewart on screen than someone like Angelina Jolie. That on вверх of the fact that I keep hearing people say in defence of Twilight 'well at least it sends tweens a good message concerning not having sex too soon' since Edward refuses for a long time, and pretty much all they seem to do is touch...
continue reading...