When a good number of critics and звезда WARS Фаны start talking about how Lucasfilm and the Дисней Studios need to recapture the "magic", I could not help but wonder what "magic" to which they were referring. The "magic" of Disney's first film in the franchise, "STAR WARS: EPISODE VII - THE FORCE AWAKENS"? The six films that George Lucas had produced between 1977 and 2005? или the "magic" of the franchise’s Original Trilogy?
If these Фаны and critics were referring to the "magic" of the Original Trilogy, I find this demand rather ironic. And I find it personally ironic, considering that it took me several years to appreciate that particular trilogy after it first came out, long ago. Do I want the "magic" of the Original Trilogy to be repeated? No. Not really. или should I say . . . not literally. In the words of F. Scott Fitzgerald, "you can’t repeat the past". But a person can Переместить on and experience или create something new in his или her life. And in regard to a movie, a novel или any other works of art . . . a person can create something new, while at the same time, pay homage to a past work of art или form a narrative connection to it.
I am a big Фан of the Original Trilogy movies. Even though it took several years for me to appreciate them, I became a big Фан of that first trilogy. I am also a big Фан of the Prequel Trilogy movies, "ROGUE ONE: A звезда WARS STORY" and "SOLO: A звезда WARS STORY". And one of the reasons why I am is that while having a connection to the Original Trilogy from a narrative point of view, those five films managed to offer something new to the franchise.
The Prequel Trilogy had depicted the downfalls of Anakin Skywalker aka Darth Vader, the Jedi Order, and the Galactic Republic. The trilogy also conveyed how these calamities had led to the emergence of the Galactic Empire and the Sith in the form of Emperor Sheev Palpatine. And the 1999-2005 trilogy did all of this with a great deal of ambiguity that I found еще than satisfying. This ambiguity was also on display in stand alone Фильмы like "ROGUE ONE" and "SOLO". "ROGUE ONE" not only told the story of the theft of the Death звезда plans; but with a great deal of brutality hardly ever seen in Назад Фильмы of the STAR WARS franchise. "SOLO" conveyed the origins of Han Solo, one of the leading characters from the Original Trilogy. Unlike the STAR WARS films before it, "SOLO" gave audiences еще than a mere peek into the criminal Другой мир within the STAR WARS saga. Ironically, the leading protagonists of both stand alone films were not Force sensitive individuals.
The Original Trilogy was not perfect. Neither were the Prequel Trilogy, “ROGUE ONE” and “SOLO”. I believe that the two trilogies and the two stand alone films had their flaws. But for me, their virtues . . . in which originality happen to be one of them . . . far outweighed their flaws. However, I cannot say the same about the first two films featured in the Последнее Sequel Trilogy, produced by Lucasfilm and the Дисней Studios.
I am willing to give the trilogy points for conveying some originality. None of the three major protagonists is a white male . . . so far. The main antagonist, who is constantly compared to Anakin Skywalker aka Darth Vader, did not come from an obscure background and/or upbringing. And this same antagonist had killed his evil mentor halfway into the trilogy. Despite these bouts of originality, I am simply not that impressed by this new trilogy. I believe there are too many plot holes and inconsistent characterizations for me to regard it as worthy entertainment. Worse, I feel that the trilogy’s first two films had borrowed just a bit too much from the 1977-1983 Фильмы for me to regard it as truly original. In fact, the Sequel Trilogy’s в общем и целом, общая narrative seemed to be a re-hash of the Original Trilogy’s Rebel Alliance-Galactic Empire conflict and the rise of Luke Skywalker as Jedi Knight. And the numerous plot holes make me begin to wonder if the trilogy’s main narrative was ever outlined in advance.
When people talk about recapturing the "magic" of the past . . . или the Original Trilogy, I find myself wondering what exactly do they want. Do they want a re-hash of the Original Trilogy? If so, the Sequel Trilogy seemed to be fulfilling that demand. или perhaps this demand is centered around having major protagonists who are white males. Who knows? But if these Фаны and critics are referring to the "spirit" of the 1977-83 trilogy, then I am at a loss. What exactly is this "spirit" или "magic"? I cannot help but wonder if an answer my last Вопрос might be riddled with pitfalls. I believe it could easily be perceived in so many ways.
Personally, I simply want a STAR WARS movie that not only connects to any of the Назад films in the franchise, but also provide something truly original . . . and well-written. The movie does not have to be perfect. I have yet to see a perfect movie - even one from the STAR WARS franchise. Nor do I expect it to be. But I hope that the franchise’s future Фильмы . . . whether they are parts of a serial или merely a stand alone . . . will be a lot better than the first two Sequel Trilogy films.
Robotnik: Snooping as usual I see! *Talks faster* Snooping as usual *Slows down* I see!
Song: link
Naboo, six months before the events of The Empire Strikes Back.
Human 49: Attention Naboo. Ceci est un message important. La rébellion prévoit une invasion. Ils nous aideront à sortir l'empire de notre planète. (Attention Naboo. This is an important message. The Rebellion is planning an invasion. They will help us push the empire out of our planet.)
Meanwhile, far from Yavin 4, hundreds of Mon Calamari Starships were travelling with blockade runners, Rebel Transports, U-Wings, Y-Wings, and...
