Do Ты think a student should have a right to choose if he или she wants to study the theory of evolution of humanity at school? или do they have to!?

Of course it should. It's really this simple: Evolution is part of science, and science is a requirement.

So just because it's not in your belief system, Ты can't even know about it? That's the most ridiculously close-minded thing I have ever heard- you're just choosing to be ignorant, choosing only to know what Форс-мажоры you.

And by the way, evolution is indeed at theory, but then, all science is. The comparison of teaching religion to teaching evolution is completely misguided- the two are incomparable.

To me, this whole argument is utterly disgusting. It makes bile rise in my throat to see people so obstinately convinced in the superiority of their own beliefs that they can't медведь to know another.

This was already asked link.

I'll just copy and paste my answer: Much like the theory of gravity, evolution is something that we see everyday. It's been something that has been proven to exist.

I don't think Ты should be able to opt out of learning the facts because Ты don't think that's where humans came from.

EDIT: I'd like to point out that just because something is a "theory" doesn't mean it's not a fact. Theory means something different in scientific terms than it doesn't in every день vernacular. So does the word "law", for that matter.
link
link

Редактировать 2: The theory of evolution states that modern organisms are descendants of ancient organisms and that modifications accumulated over time explain the apparent changes and differences among modern forms of life.
link

If Ты choose to use inventions like the computer and the internet in order to communicate, then Ты should have no problem learning about evolution.

Do Ты have any issues about learning any other part of the science curriculum?

No, evolution isn't law. But going to school is (well, it is in my country) and at school Ты learn science, and evolution is a scientific theory that has been supported, and continues to be supported, by empirical scientific evidence.

I had no desire to learn maths. I hated maths. Maths was evil and made my brain hurt. I didn't believe in maths. But I still had to learn it.

Ты let kids pick what they want to learn, they'll pick ice cream and tv.

Alright, I've got a few responses for you:

1) No amount of learning is a law. It's a standard with regards to school systems that they learn a certain amount of math, English, the sciences, and any number of other subjects. No one is legally required to learn them. By that standard, no school should require students to learn anything.

2. Uncomfortability is not a good standard either. Many people are uncomfortable learning mathematics. That doesn't mean they can opt out of it.

3. The general perspective you're applying here is that Ты dislike it, Ты don't believe in it, so why should Ты have to learn it? The answer is that it's the most reasonable theory available. Science is all about theory. There are very few "laws," and even those are considered theory. The so-called "law of gravity" is still referred to as a theory, not because there's a lack of evidence, but because scientific sources always like to leave the option open to change the theory. It is theoretically possible that we'll find a location on this planet with abnormal gravity. It is also possible gravity doesn't actually exist - we've never found a particle that produces gravity, unlike pretty much every other force in the universe. We're still confused by the way gravity functions in many instances. Should we stop teaching it due to those uncertainties? No. Should we allow people to opt out because they disagree with it? No.

4. In the end, most of what your argument equates to is whining. Ты dislike the subject because it doesn't fit with your worldview, most likely the result of a religious background. Ты can believe what Ты will, no teacher can force Ты to accept the theory of evolution, but that doesn't mean Ты или anyone else can opt out of learning it. If we went by your logic, anyone who feels uncomfortable about any topic can opt out of it. That erases the whole point of school, which functions to keep people at или above a certain standard of education. There's no point to that if we go by your standards.

Absolutely. Much like how if someone isn't Christian, they aren't forced to take part in the services and Christian teaches at a Christian school. (I know of many people who didn't have to even though they went to a Christian или Catholic school)

So I don't believe it should be any different the other way around.

No.

I think that's just being stubborn and refusing to even acknowledge the fact that different ideas exist. That's a bit like refusing to learn about the Franco-Perrusian war necause you're not German или French. (But different because evolution effects all of humanity)
или refusing to know what Hannukah is because you're Christian.

1. Math isn't a law either. Neither is Literature или spelling.
2. I feel uncomfortable learning about the digestive system. I think it's disgusting, but that's not a good enough reason to be excused from the lesson.

But then were would the line be drawn? Could students opt out of studying math или English?

There are certain requirements for education, and one of them is to teach what is scientific fact.

Evolution is scientific fact.

Therefore it is should be required. People can't pick and choose what they want to learn and then graduate with their classmates without having completed the curriculum. We need еще educated people in America not less.

Besides, if Ты disagree with something what's wrong with learning еще about it? Being informed is always good. I often read opposing arguments to see if the other side has any good points and in order to Дебаты Ты must have a good understanding of the topic Ты are debating. How can Ты say Ты don't believe something if Ты don't understand it and don't care too?

And really, Ты learn little in high school about evolution as it is. So if Ты don't want to study it in detail, then don't major in biology in college. Simple.

It doesn't really matter whether people are uncomfortable about evolution. It's accepted by the vast majority of scientists who have studied it and actually know what they are talking about, and it would be dishonest and quite frankly unethical to not include modern scientific knowledge in the schools curriculum.

1.Evolution is a fact accepted by the vast majority of modern biologists.

2.So what? People can feel uncomfortable about a lot of things they learn at school. We can't allow anyone to not learn about something just because they don't like it.

I personally don't see why. I'm Christian myself, although I don't have a problem with learning about evolution. I guess Ты can say I'm open towards both Adam and Eve and evolution being the story as to how the world began. Partly because I believe that either way, God had something to do with it.


As for learning evolution in schools;

Although I myself don't mind learning about it, I can understand why others wouldn't. It's not so much that they don't want to be open-minded towards other ideas, as some people here have put it. It's the fact that they, like others will surely do on this webpage, want to stand by their beliefs and not be feed information that they see, as some people here may see religion, as utter bullshit.

And I can honestly understand that perspective.

And really, if not wanting to learn about evolution throughout high school is a narrow-minded action and poor choice, who is it really impacting other than the person who chose not to take the damn class? -_-
As much as any plausible ignorance irritates me, it's only (as some people see it) damaging the person who chose not to learn about the damn evolution theory. Not much of anyone else.


That's just my opinion.

Ok, I don't believe in most of evolution. It has not been proven to be fact. The fact is, that people have been told evolution is a proven fact enough time to cause them to believe it.
I think that there are so many things that would be impossible to happen by pure chance of evolution. My suggestion would be to offer an elective course in the Theory of Intellegent Design. Let the students decide on the basis of what both theories have to offer.
If anyone is interested, Ты can Google the dvd, "No Intellegence Allowed". Ты can watch it online. It gives an explanation of Intellegent Design, and explains why some Science Proffesionals and Profressors have been censored for believing it.

If people get the choice to not have to learn about religion at schools, then I don't see why religious people should have to learn something that can counter-act what they believe in in some ways, so to speak. Yes, I understand that evolution has been proven in a few ways, but there are also pieces of evolution that have not been proven. Plus, I took biology at university, so I personally believe in many of the theories that biologists have proposed, yet I still can look at this issue from both sides. Ты see, I don't think people should be 'forced' to learn anything, I think everyone should get the choice in what they want to learn, because science, maths and english are not the only important subjects out there. Plus, Science and maths are only important for some careers, not everyone is going to want to be a physicist, или biologist. If people want to miss out some topics that others see as important, well, that is THEIR choice, even if others see it as dumb, it is still their choice. How would Ты like it if your teacher said: 'We are taking out science, so that Ты no longer have the choice.' How would that make Ты feel?